SPECIFICATIONS INTO DECISIONS

See the check.
Understand the choice.

Twelve illustrated examples for your next screen, arm or desk decision.

Published limits and clearly labeled example inputs. These illustrations are not installation photos, customer testimonials or physical tests.

Download all images & text ↓

Original diagrams, made from the recorded specifications and explicit assumptions.

Screen & arm04 examples Desk & mounting04 examples Desk space04 examples

Screen & arm

Four ways a headline capacity can hide another condition.

Load-window illustration: G95C bare-panel mass 10.6 kg is below the HX HD 45-647-224 minimum 12.7 kg. — Published-specification comparison. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

01 / 12 · Published-specification comparison

Why a heavier-duty arm can still miss the G95C’s load window

LS49CG954ENXZA: 10.6 kg without stand. Recorded HX HD minimum: 12.7 kg.

Shopping for a monitor arm by maximum capacity alone can miss the lower end of the range. Samsung’s US LS49CG954ENXZA, the G95C VA model, has a published 10.6 kg bare-panel figure. The recorded Ergotron HX with HD Pivot 45-647-224 starts at 12.7 kg. With the documented direct-mount arrangement and no extra adapter mass, that panel is below the stated minimum.

That is a specific load comparison, not a verdict on every Odyssey G9 or every HX kit. Other G9 versions have different mass and mounting instructions. An added accessory would need its actual mass and mechanical fit checked; improvised ballast is not an approved workaround here.

The useful next step is to identify the complete monitor model, compare both ends of the exact kit’s load window, and review the depth and desktop conditions. The linked example shows the failed minimum check and the remaining unknowns. This is a source-based illustration, not a physically tested installation.

Load comparison only. Other installation conditions still need review.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Samsung · S005 Catalog review 2026-10-25
Ergotron · S002 Catalog review 2026-10-25
Samsung · S018 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

A 57-inch G95NC display compared with the VIVO G1U hard 49-inch limit, with the required bracket’s mass labeled unknown. — Published-specification comparison. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

02 / 12 · Published-specification comparison

Why a 57-inch G9 needs more than a kilogram check

LS57CG952NNXZA is 57 inches; the recorded STAND-V101G1U screen limit is 49 inches.

A monitor can fail an arm’s screen-size limit even before a weight comparison is complete. The US Samsung LS57CG952NNXZA, the Neo G9 G95NC, is a 57-inch display. The recorded VIVO STAND-V101G1U has a hard 49-inch maximum. Those are different limits, so a plausible weight rating cannot make this pair pass the screen-size check.

There is another separate condition on this Samsung: the exact US manual requires its BRACKET WALL before mounting. The bracket’s contribution to the complete assembly mass, including whether the net figure already includes it, has not been established in this catalog. Zero is not a replacement for that missing evidence.

Even a different arm with a suitable geometry window still needs the full mounted load, plate contact and desktop checked. Start with the exact model and kit, then keep failed checks and unknowns visible together. This comparison is based on documents; it is not an installation test or a claim that all 49-inch ratings are interchangeable.

The required bracket’s load contribution remains unverified.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Samsung · S014 Catalog review 2026-10-26
Samsung · S019 Catalog review 2026-10-26
VIVO · S013 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

The 2.82 kg P2222H panel plotted below the 3.2 kg minimum of LX 45-241-224. — Published-specification comparison. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

03 / 12 · Published-specification comparison

A small Dell screen can be too light for an otherwise capable arm

Dell P2222H: 2.82 kg. Recorded LX 45-241-224: 3.2–11.3 kg.

A light office monitor is not automatically a match for an arm with plenty of headline capacity. Dell publishes a 2.82 kg panel-only figure for the P2222H. The recorded Ergotron LX 45-241-224, the two-piece-clamp configuration, starts at 3.2 kg. With direct mounting and no added adapter, this specific panel is below that minimum.

Use the panel weight without its removable desk stand, rather than a boxed or stand-inclusive figure. Keep the exact arm SKU too: another LX revision or an LX Pro is not the same configuration. A tension adjustment does not change the published lower limit, and this example does not establish an approved counterweight.

Other recorded arms have different minimums, but a lower minimum alone does not approve the whole setup. VESA, mounting-plate contact, clamp conditions and desk-maker guidance still matter. Open the example to see the lower-load failure, or compare candidates for the exact Dell model. These are documented limits, not a claim based on a real customer installation.

Exact LX two-piece-clamp kit. Not an LX Pro comparison.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Dell · S008 Catalog review 2026-10-26
Ergotron · S011 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

The 104.4 mm LG panel depth compared with the 89 mm LX review threshold; capacity is labeled unknown, not failed. — Published-specification comparison. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

04 / 12 · Published-specification comparison

When a curved LG fits the nominal weight range but needs a depth review

34GN85B-B: 104.4 mm physical depth. Recorded LX depth condition: above 89 mm.

A normal-looking weight comparison does not settle every curved-screen question. LG publishes a 5.5 kg bare panel and 104.4 mm physical depth for the US 34GN85B-B. Its weight lies inside the recorded LX 45-241-224 window. Its depth, however, is above the 89 mm threshold associated with that kit’s depth-dependent capacity condition.

The result is a prompt for clarification, not proof that the monitor is overloaded. This catalog does not contain a verified reduced capacity for that exact depth and setup. It therefore keeps the condition unknown rather than silently treating the headline maximum as an approval.

Physical depth is the front-to-back dimension without the stand; curvature radius and diagonal are different measurements. Use the exact LG model rather than substituting a similarly named display. The linked example separates the nominal weight check from the unresolved depth condition and the desktop questions. This illustration does not report sagging, a failure test or a tested recommendation.

Crossing this threshold is not proof of overload or failure.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

LG · S015 Catalog review 2026-10-26
Ergotron · S011 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

Desk & mounting

Four questions to settle at the actual mounting point.

A 25 mm illustrative desktop inside the MI-4881 thickness range, alongside three unresolved questions: construction, permission and contact. — Hypothetical desktop input. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

05 / 12 · Hypothetical desktop input

A 25 mm desktop can clear the clamp range while the setup stays unknown

Illustrative 25 mm thickness versus the recorded 10–84 mm MI-4881 clamp range.

Consider an illustrative desktop thickness of 25 mm with the recorded Mount-It MI-4881. That number is inside this catalog’s 10–84 mm C-clamp range. The thickness check can match while the overall result still needs verification. The 25 mm value is an example input, not a measurement taken from a customer’s desk.

Thickness alone does not identify the desktop’s construction, establish maker permission or show that both clamp pads can make clear contact. A frame, bevel or cable tray may also change what the clamp actually bears on. A general desk load rating does not answer these installation questions.

The linked example deliberately leaves construction, permission and contact unknown. It does not pre-check an owner confirmation or approve a backing plate. Replace every illustrative value with facts for the actual mounting point and supplied kit. Keeping a matched thickness check separate from the unresolved desktop checks is more useful than treating one good number as a complete fit decision.

25 mm is illustrative. Thickness is not a strength calculation.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Mount-It · S004 Catalog review 2026-10-25

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

A conceptual tabletop illustration labeled US LAGKAPTEN / ADILS S29416758 with a maker-restriction notice. Not a product drawing or installation photo. — Exact-US-article manufacturer guidance. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

06 / 12 · Exact-US-article manufacturer guidance

For this exact LAGKAPTEN desk, check the maker restriction first

Recorded US LAGKAPTEN / ADILS S29416758: screen-stand installation is restricted by the maker.

An arm’s load rating cannot override a desktop maker’s mounting restriction. The recorded US IKEA LAGKAPTEN / ADILS combination S29416758, article 294.167.58, has product guidance that excludes screen-stand installation. Its tabletop material description also identifies a honeycomb paper filling. This example is tied to that exact combination and market.

A matching clamp opening or a general desk load figure does not cancel the restriction. The checker does not turn this result into a pass after adding an assumed reinforcement plate. That would need its own applicable manufacturer guidance, not an inference from a different desk or someone else’s installation.

Use the full desk article, current official instructions and the actual supplied configuration. Do not transfer this finding to every IKEA desktop or to a similarly named product in another country. The linked example shows a documented maker restriction, with sources available for inspection. It is not a photograph, load test or report of a customer’s desk failing.

US S29416758 only. Not a claim about every IKEA desktop.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

IKEA · S006 Catalog review 2026-10-27

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

Conceptual clamp side view: an underside rail blocks pad contact despite an illustrative 25 mm desktop thickness. Not to scale. — Hypothetical obstruction input. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

07 / 12 · Hypothetical obstruction input

The clamp can open far enough and still have nowhere to sit

Illustrative 25 mm top with a blocked underside contact area. The obstruction is a separate failed check.

Imagine a 25 mm desktop whose underside frame blocks the clamp’s bearing area. The top can fall inside the arm’s stated thickness range and still fail the contact check. This is a hypothetical obstruction example; the drawing is conceptual and does not assign a universal rail distance or clearance requirement.

Inspect the actual mounting position above and below the top. A drawer, rear rail, bevel or cable tray can prevent the supplied pads from sitting as the maker intends. Opening the clamp farther does not by itself solve an obstructed contact surface. Moving a tray or changing mounting method also needs the relevant instructions checked.

The linked preset records a blocked edge but leaves desktop permission unconfirmed. It does not invent a tested workaround, a spacer size or a drilling instruction. Use the exact clamp drawing, installation access and desktop guidance before choosing a different position. A source-linked thickness match and a failed contact check can appear in the same report without contradicting each other.

Concept drawing only. No universal rail clearance is implied.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Mount-It · S004 Catalog review 2026-10-25

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

Illustrative load addition: 19.5 kg panel plus 1 kg adapter totals 20.5 kg, above the recorded 19.9 kg maximum. — Hypothetical assembly input. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

08 / 12 · Hypothetical assembly input

An adapter can turn a near-limit load into an overload

Illustrative 19.5 kg panel + 1 kg adapter = 20.5 kg, above the recorded 19.9 kg MI-4881 maximum.

A weight check needs the complete mounted assembly, not just the panel. Take an explicitly hypothetical 19.5 kg panel and a 1 kg attached adapter. If the panel figure excludes that adapter, their total is 20.5 kg. That exceeds this catalog’s recorded 19.9 kg maximum for the Mount-It MI-4881.

The panel and adapter values are demonstration inputs, not measurements of a named monitor or an advertised adapter product. Before adding any real accessory, establish what the published panel mass already includes so that nothing is counted twice. The adapter’s mechanical fit and arm-side mounting pattern also remain separate questions.

The example deliberately does not confirm that this hypothetical adapter fits a real unit. Even with that question open, the entered assembly is already over the recorded maximum. Open the preset to see the overload and unresolved items together. Other checks, desktop conditions and installation instructions still matter; this is arithmetic using illustrative inputs, not a physical overload test.

Hypothetical masses. Adapter fit has not been confirmed.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Mount-It · S004 Catalog review 2026-10-25

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

Desk space

Four editable width plans, using published outside dimensions.

Two 609.9 mm display widths, a 20 mm gap and 50 mm at each side total 1339.8 mm on a 1,400 mm width plan. — Editable geometric planning example. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

09 / 12 · Editable geometric planning example

Will two P2722H displays fit a 140 cm width plan?

609.9 + 609.9 + 20 + 2 × 50 = 1,339.8 mm.

Two “27-inch” labels are not two monitor widths. Dell publishes an outside width of 609.9 mm for the P2722H. Put two upright, forward-facing units side by side, choose a 20 mm gap and reserve 50 mm at each side: the width plan totals 1,339.8 mm. Against an illustrative 1,400 mm desktop width, that leaves 60.2 mm.

The gap, side allowances and desktop width are editable planning inputs, not manufacturer minimums or a recommendation for your body. The figure compares front-view widths only. Stand bases, cables, rear clearance, depth, viewing comfort and room access require their own checks.

Open the calculator with this example loaded and replace the measurements with your actual constraints. Angled or portrait screens need a different layout, and an arm does not automatically establish desk permission or strength. This example shows that the chosen width arithmetic fits; it does not certify a complete workstation or a dual-monitor arm.

Chosen gaps and margins. Depth and installation are not assessed.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Dell · S008 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

A 609.9 mm P2722H and 537.8 mm P2422H form a 1267.6999999999998 mm plan after the chosen gap and margins. — Editable geometric planning example. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

10 / 12 · Editable geometric planning example

Mixed monitors need two actual widths, not one duplicated diagonal

P2722H 609.9 mm + P2422H 537.8 mm + chosen allowances = 1,267.7 mm.

A mixed-screen layout needs a width for each model. Dell publishes 609.9 mm for the P2722H and 537.8 mm for the P2422H. With a chosen 20 mm gap and 50 mm at each side, this side-by-side plan totals 1,267.7 mm. An illustrative 1,400 mm desktop leaves 132.3 mm in that width comparison.

Using the same diagonal-based estimate twice would lose the difference between the two actual panels. The calculator lets you choose each model independently or enter each measured outside width. A stand or support that is wider than the panel needs a separate footprint review.

All allowances are editable, and the displays are modeled upright and facing forward. The remaining width is not spare room guaranteed for every speaker, cable or notebook; include the space you actually need in the plan. Depth, viewing comfort and mounting suitability are separate tasks. This is a geometric example from published dimensions, not a photo or report of a customer workstation.

Front projection only. Choose your own gaps and allowances.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Dell · S008 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

Adding an illustrative 350 mm laptop and a second 20 mm gap increases the width plan to 1709.8 mm, exceeding the 1,400 mm example width. — Editable geometric planning example. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

11 / 12 · Editable geometric planning example

Adding a side laptop adds another gap as well as its own width

The 1,339.8 mm two-screen plan becomes 1,709.8 mm with a 350 mm laptop and another 20 mm gap.

Adding an open laptop beside two screens creates a third object, so there is another neighbouring gap to count. Start with the two-P2722H example at 1,339.8 mm, including its chosen gap and side allowances. Add an illustrative 350 mm laptop or laptop-stand width and one more 20 mm gap. The new plan totals 1,709.8 mm.

Against the same illustrative 1,400 mm desktop width, that plan is 309.8 mm short. The 350 mm and 20 mm values are planning choices, not a claim about every laptop. Replace the width with the actual device or support you will use.

A vertical laptop holder, a laptop behind a screen or an angled arrangement is a different footprint and is not modeled by this side-by-side drawing. The result is a width deficit under the entered assumptions, not a blanket statement that laptops cannot fit small desks. Use the linked preset to change the equipment and gaps before considering a different arrangement.

350 mm laptop is illustrative. Other arrangements need measurement.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Dell · S008 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

1339.8 mm shown as approximately 52.75 inches beside the 1,400 mm, approximately 55.12 inch, example desktop. — Unit-conversion planning example. Open the full-size image to inspect the labels.

12 / 12 · Unit-conversion planning example

Switching units should not change the physical desk plan

1,339.8 mm ≈ 52.75 in; the 1,400 mm example width ≈ 55.12 in.

A unit switch should describe the same physical arrangement. The two-P2722H plan totals 1,339.8 mm with its chosen gap and margins. Using 25.4 mm per inch, that is about 52.75 inches. The illustrative 1,400 mm desktop width is about 55.12 inches. These displayed inch values are rounded; the calculator retains the underlying lengths.

Do not relabel a millimetre number as inches or replace a display’s physical outside width with its diagonal. If you copy rounded values into a different calculator, a small rounding difference is possible. Switching units inside this tool converts the entered lengths, including the gap and side allowances.

The physical conclusion is unchanged: this example has width left over, while depth and installation remain unassessed. Open the inch preset, switch back to millimetres and inspect the same plan. That is a conversion demonstration, not a universal desk recommendation, an ergonomic assessment or a tested workstation. Replace every illustrative allowance with the space you need.

Displayed inch values are rounded; depth remains unassessed.

Try these illustrative inputs →Read the guide

Manufacturer sources

Dell · S008 Catalog review 2026-10-26

Share this example

Attach its PNG when sharing. The link points to this example on the collection page.

Use your own setup next.

Examples explain the method. Replace their inputs with your actual equipment, source documents and constraints.

Check my screen and arm Plan my desk width